Showing posts with label mobile. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mobile. Show all posts

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Top 10 Tech Trends: 4/10 are mobile

From the Churchill Clubs Top 10 Tech Trends Dinner. Six pundits-- 10 trends. Interesting that four of the trends concern mobile:

  1. The mobile phone will be a mainstream personal computer.
  2. Betting on smart phones: The mobile device migration to smart phones from features phones will produce even greater disruption than PC industry moving from character mode to graphical interface.
  3. Within 5 years, everything that matters to you will be available to you on a device that fits on your belt or in your purse.
  4. 80% of the world population will carry mobile Internet devices within 5-10 years.

Even though I agree with all of these predictions they still got my attention.

Friday, March 28, 2008

Nokia N810 WiMAX

Nokia is releasing an N810 WiMAX capable version of its internet tablet next week. If I lived in an area with WiMAX coverage I'd be in line to get one of these right now. I have the Wi-Fi version of the N810, and it is an incredible device. I have an iPhone and iPod Touch, but my meeting and/or conference weapon of choice is the N810 without question.

Friday, March 7, 2008

Mobile platforms and the iPhone

I was reading this article on the state of mobile platforms, Mobile: The New Platform War, and they had this to say on the iPhone:

The iPhone is without a doubt one of the most revolutionary mobile phones on the market (disclaimer: I’m a proud owner.). While other phones provide similar capabilities, none have been able to put everything together in a package as easily accessible and usable as the iPhone. Critics gripe about the iPhone’s poor camera and the EDGE connection, but it’s seen incredible sales and has received tons of praise from industry insiders. The Safari browser, perhaps the hallmark feature of the device, is the first mobile browser to allow users to peruse full websites, rendered nearly without any alterations. It’s not a pocket-sized version of the internet; it’s the whole thing.

It truly is an amazing device. When I read this, however, it reminded me that I had said some pretty snarky things about EDGE before I had actually purchased my iPhone. I was, of course, passing along what others had said because I had no way of really knowing. Now I need to come clean. I really don't have any problems with EDGE whatsoever. It works just fine. The performance of the iPhone on EDGE is absolutely better than the performance I used to get with my Treo 700 on EVDO.

From my own experience the criticism of EDGE is unwarranted. I will be upgrading to the G3 phone when it becomes available, however. Speed is speed.

Wednesday, December 5, 2007

The end of pay phones... cell phones next

I thoroughly enjoyed this read at the Yourdon Report on the end of the pay phone.

It didn’t really come as a surprise when I saw the story that ATT had announced it would withdraw from the pay-phone marketplace within the next year; if anything, it’s a surprise that there are any pay phones any more, at least in urban centers around the world.

What confused me, however, is that the article was titled: Bye bye, cell phones. I kept reading expecting a conclusion that cell phones would be obsolete in the near future as well. It didn't go there, and the title still confuses me, but I'm glad I kept reading. The story had an amusing and surprising ending.

It was this post by Harold Feld, Four Reasons Why Google Will Bid To Win in the 700 MHz Auction, that had me thinking optimistically about the end of the cell phone in the first place.

1. Google Has A Different Vision For the Wireless World It Can Only Achieve By Owning Licenses.

OK, the biggest problem is that analysts are looking at this as if Google wanted to break into the wireless phone business and introduce the fabled “G-Phone” similar to the Apple iPhone. But that's not what Google (and the rest of Silicon Valley) want. What Google really wants is far more audacious. Google wants to eliminate the entire wireless “phone” industry and replace it with the “mobile broadband” industry. In this world, people do not buy “mobile phone service” with the option to load all manner of various features for additional prices onto their phones. People buy a wireless service contract for a “dumb pipe” similar to what they buy (now) from cable and dsl companies.

We can only hope that the death of the cell phone is following shortly on the heels of the pay phone. Can't happen soon enough as far as I'm concerned.

Thursday, November 22, 2007

My toys runneth over

I've got two really interesting pieces of hardware coming soon. The first, and one y'all should get today, or at least before November 26th is the XO laptop. The One Laptop Per Child Foundation (OLPC) is doing an interesting promotion right now: Give One Get One. You buy two, you get one and the other is donated to a child in a developing country. "It's not a laptop project, it is an education project."

Between November 12 and November 26, OLPC is offering a Give One Get One program in the United States and Canada. This is the first time the revolutionary XO laptop has been made available to the general public. For a donation of $399, one XO laptop will be sent to empower a child in a developing nation and one will be sent to the child in your life in recognition of your contribution. $200 of your donation is tax-deductible (your $399 donation minus the fair market value of the XO laptop you will be receiving).

The second toy I have coming is a Nokia N810 Internet tablet. I'm anxious to compare this device to the iPod Touch. It arrives on Monday. I hate waiting, but am doing my best to be patient. I'll give you a report Monday night.


UPDATE: The OLPC has extended the Give One Get One program until December 31st.

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

Paying for wi-fi at airports?

The NY Times has an article this morning on what hotels and airports are doing to try to make remote work better for travelers: On the Job, Everywhere:

Still, Kenneth Buchanan, executive vice president for revenue management at Dallas-Fort Worth, said the airport’s research had shown that business travelers are willing to pay for secure, reliable Internet access. (The entire airport has Wi-Fi coverage through a partnership with T-Mobile; logging on costs $9.99 for 24 hours.)

Really, is that true? I know I've started to adjust my travel to go through hubs that offer free wireless whenever possible. I also know that I'm not ever paying $10 (or whatever) for access on a normal trip, i.e. I'm not stranded. I know that I should probably purchase an EVDO card and have access everywhere, but quite honestly I'm already paying over $300/month for connectivity through cable, phone, etc. and it's just too much.

What about you? Do you think Kenneth is telling a whopper about people's willingness to pay for an hour or so of wi-fi access? I can't believe they're making that much money from offering pay-to-connect Internet service.

Monday, November 19, 2007

QOTD: Umair Haque on open telecommunications

Umair Haque from the Bubble Generation Strategy Lab:

In case you didn't notice, Google + Skype + open spectrum/devices/apps = byebye telcos.

Let the disruption begin...

Thursday, November 15, 2007

iPhone and text entry

As you all know I'm seriously considering getting an iPhone (actually several) when my current Verizon contract expires. I'd mentioned before the lack of a physical keyboard with the iPhone as an issue. Last night I came across a study confirming this deficiency: QWERTY Texters Demonstrated Drop in Efficiency When Texting on iPhone

Compared to hard-key QWERTY devices, the iPhone may fall short for consumers who use on their mobile device heavily for email and text messaging. The iPhone was clearly associated with higher text entry error rates than a hard-key QWERTY phone.

The study pretty much confirms what I already knew from the month I've been using my iPod Touch. It's definitely harder to enter text on the Touch's built in keypad.

Where the Touch shines is with the Internet experience, and in particular the Safari browser. Life is about making choices. I'm still thinking that the browsing experience on the Touch is so superior that I'm willing to sacrifice the less than desirable text entry capability.

I have found that if I just leave the mistake ridden text alone and send it anyway, that most people have no problem whatsoever in determining the context and figuring out what I really meant. Perhaps this is one of those areas where we're going to have to get over our perfectionism and accept the text as good enough? ehat do yiu thinl? Can we libe with good eoifg?

Monday, November 12, 2007

Google to acquire Sprint?

This rumor being circulated this morning is very interesting, VoIP Blogger, Rumor Mill: Google Acquiring Sprint

Recent news that Sprint is not going to work with Clearwire to build out a WiMAX network only added to the rumors I have been hearing about Google acquiring Sprint Nextel. On the surface it seems like this would be a bad move for Google but in reality the world’s leading search engine has become so much more than just a website to go to when you want to find a trinket of information… The company now needs a wireless network to allow it to grow in the mobile search and related spaces such as watching YouTube videos on the subway.

I speculated last week that I thought Sprint was in need of LOTS of help: Sprint in need of a sugar daddy? Google acquiring Sprint makes too much sense. Someone has got to come to the rescue of the mobile computing public. No one could do this better than Google. Every single consumer knows the current system is hopelessly broken, and we're looking for someone to save us. Google could totally disrupt this industry in the way that Apple did to the music business.

We are on the verge of a mobile computing revolution that will be driven by the next generation of smartphones. The soon to emerge smartphone customers don't necessarily even want voice. Voice is not the killer application. They do want access to data and other forms of computer mediated communications, however, and the currently available mobile data networks totally suck.

Google could make a killing in this space. We can only hope the rumors are true.

Sunday, November 4, 2007

Sprint in need of a sugar daddy?

I've been reading a bunch about the new Google mobile play which is to be announced tomorrow. Apparently, the U.S. carriers that Google will partner with involve Sprint and T-mobile. The rumors of the announcement sent me off reading all sorts of things that I wouldn't normally pay attention.

I've been reading of Sprint's financial problems and their hemorrhaging of customers. Apparently they have extended contracts to people of questionable financial means, and much like the sub-prime mortgage problem, many of these customers are walking away from their contracts. This puts Sprint in a bind right at a time they are trying to roll out a new 4th generation high speed network called WiMax. WiMax is really fast, and is without question a better mobile technology than Verizon's EVDO, and it's light years better than AT&T's 3G Edge network.

The problem is that the Sprint good-old-boys are not happy with trying to build for the future when they are totally screwing-up the present. Sound familiar? The worry about the next quarter crowd ousted the CEO over this and they are currently rudderless. Reading about their quandary it is obvious that there is a lot of internal bickering about Sprint's path going forward.

"They should stop the WiMax rollout immediately," said Patrick Comack, an equities analyst with Zachary Research. "They need to get back to the basics and learn how to run a wireless company. This means focusing more on the present rather than the future."

Of course, the "present" opportunities have pretty well played themselves out. The market for the current voice stuff is saturated. Raise your hand if you are in the market for your first cell phone? Exactly. So to play in the present means you have to steal customers from others in order to compete. Like that's going to happen. Is Sprint going to compete on price? You get the picture, they are in a total pickle.

Which brings me to Google, and their announcement scheduled for tomorrow. Give Google access to a 3g network today, and then add in the potential for Google to win the 700mhz spectrum auction and the whole telecommunication world is tossed into total chaos. Google could totally pull an Apple and change an industry forever.

To say the telecommunications industry is in need of some new thinking would be an understatement. The telcos are in need of a complete brain transplant. It can't happen soon enough. I'm thinking Google as the sugar daddy sounds pretty sweet.

Saturday, September 15, 2007

QOTD: Bob Warfield on the iTrojanHorse

From SmoothSpan Blog: iPhone, iTouch, iTrojanHorse?

iTouch shows that there is huge value in a device that doesn’t even talk to the telco infrastructure. This is the vision that says you’d rather have WiFi (flavor o’ the day) and VOIP than mess around with cell technology.

Friday, September 14, 2007

Google, Verizon, Apple, and my dream for a wireless future

This is a mashup post about wireless, Wi-Fi devices, our sucky telecomunnication providers, and some hopes for the future. I'm doing a bit of thinking outloud and hopefully in the end I will pull it all together. Bear with me.

I got this from Verizon today:

Never worry about Text Messaging driving up your bill! Switch to an America’s Choice® Select Calling Plan with UNLIMITED Messaging and send as many Text, Picture and Video Messages as you want to anyone on any network in the U.S. All for one low price with a 1- or 2-year renewal!

I can't be bribed over a good deal on SMS. I will not be signing up with Verizon again when my contract is up in January. I don't like Verizon and their business practices. Mostly what disgusts me is their trying to do business through litigation versus competing for their customers by providing better service. For example their lawsuit against Vonage:

Verizon® has pursued litigation against Vonage® in an effort to achieve in court what it cannot achieve in the marketplace. Verizon has sued Vonage over patents they claim cover all of VoIP. Why?

Then there is this Verizon lawsuit on the looming 700mhz spectrum auction:

Verizon Wireless challenged in federal appeals court the Federal Communications Commission’s 700 MHz open-access rules, the opening salvo in what could evolve into a messy legal battle. The move puts a cloud of uncertainty over the upcoming auction of more than a thousand wireless licenses in prime airwaves.

So what is Verizon up to? First they attack the technology that enables VoIP. Then they turn right around and attack the wireless spectrum space that could render the current, and sucky 3G phone networks obsolete. They're sounding a bit scared...

Google, on the other hand appears to be working on our behalf, Consumer choice is always the right answer

The nation's spectrum airwaves are not the birthright of any one company. They are a unique and valuable public resource that belong to all Americans. The FCC's auction rules are designed to allow U.S. consumers -- for the first time -- to use their handsets with any network they desire, and download and use the lawful software applications of their choice.

Thank you Google! I've thought for sometime that Google was up to something big. There's this speculation about the GPhone, which by the way isn't a phone at all but a Wi-Fi device, and their alliance with Apple who has that innocuous little device called the iPod Touch which is an iPhone without the phone. Two phones that aren't really phones. Right! All speculation of course, but if it walks like a duck...

This article by Cringely: The Power of Six: Google's plan for world domination speculating about mesh networking and the use of the 700mhz spectrum gives me great hope. The current network infrastructure in this country sucks! Have you traveled domestically lately and tried to connect to the network in an airport? I rest my case. We need radical change. So I get all tingly when I see stuff like this:

First let’s start by looking at the infrastructure Google has already built or committed to building — the largest fiber backbone in the world and the largest and most widely distributed data center build-out in the world. Both are FAR in excess of Google’s current or even future requirements UNLESS they are also intended to work with a massive 700-MHz wireless network.

Imagine a hybrid wireless broadband mesh network using 700-MHz connections for backhaul and some truly mobile links and WiFi for local service. Google has enough experience with WiFi in Mountain View to know that it isn’t, by itself, a good solution for wide area networks. The key failing of metro WiFi networks is backhaul to the Internet backbone. But if Google used its 700 MHz band for that AND implemented it as a true mesh network, there would easily be enough capacity to serve almost any size network given a suitable number of backbone connections.

TO DIE FOR!!!! I only hope to see this come to fruition in my lifetime, or by 2009, whichever comes first.

Monday, August 27, 2007

Cellphone only homes

I saw this in the NY Times today: Cellphone-Only Homes Hit a Milestone (via a mention by Stowe Boyd at /Message: The Future is Now).

The milestone is a natural consequence of two trends: a glacially slow decline since 2000 in the percentage of households with landlines, and a steep rise in the number of households with cellphones. Mediamark said 84.5 percent of households now have landlines, and 86.2 percent have at least one cellphone. The data was collected through in-home surveys at roughly 13,000 homes across the country.

It's kind of a confusing read in that they are basically saying that the number of people who have a cellphone and a landline has surpassed the homes that have just landlines. Okay, people have both--that is no surprise.

The more significant thing is that the number of cellphone only homes has reached 14%, which in my opinion is not particularly impressive. Actually, I find it quite surprising that the number is so low. If you broke that down by age demographics you'd see some numbers that would make you sit up and take notice, however.

We gave up our landline almost four years ago and I can't say that we've ever missed it. Everyone in the family has a cellphone, and as I said a year ago, nobody calls a house they call a person. Other than for DSL service, what purpose does a landline serve? Why do 84.5% of homes still have them? I don't get it.

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

You do have a mobile strategy?

From Communities Dominate: Mobile subscriber update: 3 Billion mark hit in July says Informa

3 billion mobile phone subscriptions means there are more than twice as many mobile phone subscrptions as TV owners and credit card users. And of the unique mobile phones users of 2.3 billion, it is almost twice as many as have access to the internet.

If this caused you to say, "oh oh!" you're in serious trouble.

Thursday, July 12, 2007

PocketTweets: Oh crap!


I love m.twitter, a lot! But you see those buttons across the bottom in PocketTweets for the iPhone? They are nowhere to be found in m.twitter. Damn you all! You're making this very hard!

Tuesday, July 3, 2007

What's wrong with the iPhone

This is my attempt at a list of things that suck about the iPhone. The list is purely an attempt on my part to encourage waiting until January to make the purchase. This will be a dynamic list, and I will continue to flesh-it-out as additional sucky things occur to me:

Okay, I'm tapped-out. I thought about adding "no VoIP - they crippled it!" but isn't that the same as #1? Want to help me with additional items?

Sunday, July 1, 2007

QOTD: Rex Hammock

Rex Hammock on his experience of attempting to purchase an iPhone directly from AT&T: The only thing slower than the AT&T EDGE network is…

They were handling things with all of the efficiency of a cell-phone store.

The sad thing is that we all know exactly what he means. Bonus quote:

Having just seen the difference in how iPhones were flying out of an Apple Store and being slowly “processed” at an AT&T Store, I think there is going to be some culture-clashing in the coming months.

Saturday, June 30, 2007

iPhone, arghhh this is hard

I've been trying to ignore the iPhone as my current plan with Verizon isn't up until January. I even said previously:

Personally, I don't think the impact of the iPhone will be that large. Not that the iPhone doesn't appear to be awesome in every way. I would love to have one. I won't be getting one, however, as I am locked into a contract with my current provider. Even if I wasn't, I don't see myself moving to AT&T any time soon. I don't see a mass migration to AT&T occurring just so people can get an iPhone.

But when I see reviews like this from people that I really respect I start to question my resolve: The iPhone Will (Really) Revolutionize Mobile

I'm by no means an Apple fanboy - if anything, I'm an Apple skeptic - but, I have to say, the iPhone is gonna be revolutionary, transformative, revolutionary.

First - and foremost - it utterly transforms browsing the net on a mobile from a cosmic pain, to something not just palatable, but deeply, deeply desirable. Something you don't just do when you have to - something you do because you want to. That's a sea change.

Arghh! I have to admit that I am developing a serious case of phone envy. Should we start a prediction market? Can I hold out until January? I'm thinking that will be next to impossible. I almost never talk on my phone but I do live on it when I am traveling. I would have no trouble whatsoever justifying the investment. So now I'm asking myself -- what's the cost to switch? Geez, I'd so much rather ignore this.

Sunday, June 10, 2007

The coming mobile tsunami

The year that mobile finally catches the U.S. public's attention has been predicted for every year for at least the last five. The predictions are being made once again around the potential impact of the iPhone. Communities Dominate has a good read on this: Observe the signs of the Tsunami: Now New York Times talks of Mobile Blogging

Personally, I don't think the impact of the iPhone will be that large. Not that the iPhone doesn't appear to be awesome in every way. I would love to have one. I won't be getting one, however, as I am locked into a contract with my current provider. Even if I wasn't, I don't see myself moving to AT&T any time soon. I don't see a mass migration to AT&T occurring just so people can get an iPhone.

I do, however, think that mobile is finally starting to be taken seriously. The new trend in creating mobile savy websites is long overdue. I am loving these three sites in particular: m.twitter.com, m.technorati.com, and m.facebook.com. I go to these sites on my phone every single day. I look at Google Reader on my phone daily as well. I have even taken to scanning my favorite websites (of which there are very few) looking for "m" sites.

If your content isn't mobile friendly, i.e. very standard and platform neutral, you had better be prepared to bite a massively expensive bullet in the not too distant future. It's always better to do things right the first time than to spend your time and money doing expensive and time consuming repurposing after the fact.

It's also time to get very serious about making sure that your site is mobile friendly. I like this trend of building "m" sites and hope it spreads like wildfire.