tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4323202250325013491.post8301145128432119932..comments2009-10-18T20:30:42.245-05:00Kevin Gamblehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00659162207319457717noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4323202250325013491.post-48709868378242023082009-10-18T20:30:42.245-05:002009-10-18T20:30:42.245-05:00I buy that. We may have more diversity online, but it&#39;s still an issue.<br /><br />My Facebook SN (before I toasted nearly everyone) was not as diverse as it is on FriendFeed and Twitter. That may be a function of the required reciprocity that doesn&#39;t exist in FF and Twitter. It&#39;s easier to be exposed to more diverse viewpoints as you can lurk.Kevin Gamblehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00659162207319457717noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4323202250325013491.post-21120619705178750832009-10-18T11:07:34.218-05:002009-10-18T11:07:34.218-05:00What you&#39;re saying presupposes FB is not diverse or at least not diverse relative to a given individual&#39;s other social milieux. Well, that may not be the case at all.<br /><br />For instance, my FB milieu is much more diverse than the one I inhabit on a day-to-day basis.Budhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10890564471631569204noreply@blogger.com