tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4323202250325013491.post6112625457722358165..comments2007-07-15T14:10:22.867-05:00Kevin Gamblehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00659162207319457717noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4323202250325013491.post-65839580783282245982007-07-15T14:10:00.000-05:002007-07-15T14:10:00.000-05:002007-07-15T14:10:00.000-05:00It's that old classic definition of insanity, doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.<BR/><BR/>There is another face-to-face visioning meeting in the works. I hope this gives us a chance to really dig-in to how the world has changed since embarking on the current strategy.<BR/><BR/>Thank you for your comments. I know it goes without saying but we're definitely on the same page.Kevin Gamblehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00659162207319457717noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4323202250325013491.post-42102952414323143132007-07-15T13:04:00.000-05:002007-07-15T13:04:00.000-05:002007-07-15T13:04:00.000-05:00Kevin, the idea having "what if" conversations would be beneficial for us. I've been thinking in these terms for awhile. In fact, the article <A HREF="http://blog.aafromaa.com/2007/06/extension-in-web-20.html" REL="nofollow">Extension in Web 2.0</A> started out with my trying to answer the question, "If we knew we could not fail, what would our web presence look like". The original article had elements that would probably be surprising, possibly scary to some in our institutions. Thinking in these terms helps us from doing the same old things that may have be very good methods at one time, but are now not progressive, productive, and beneficial as other methods that are now available. <BR/><BR/>Face-to-face discussions and conversations would be much more appropriate and effective.Anne Adrianhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10353479928793096415noreply@blogger.com