tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4323202250325013491.post3137915868929244678..comments2008-03-02T09:14:55.506-05:00Kevin Gamblehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00659162207319457717noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4323202250325013491.post-66455482715752036812008-03-02T09:14:00.000-05:002008-03-02T09:14:00.000-05:002008-03-02T09:14:00.000-05:00Wow, thank you so much for your comment. I'm honored! <BR/><BR/>I very much appreciate your comment. I'm sure you know what a heavy slog it is trying to get people to abandon the process engineering approach. Managers want to try to manage their way to success. They have a very difficult time letting go.<BR/><BR/>One last question: When I transcribed your interview with Jon Husband I was very unsure of what you said on one word. I guessed it as "obdurant". Did I get that right?<BR/><BR/>Thanks again for stopping by!Kevinhttps://people.extension.org/kjgamblenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4323202250325013491.post-88882559398453813842008-03-01T16:53:00.000-05:002008-03-01T16:53:00.000-05:002008-03-01T16:53:00.000-05:00I think that designing enterprise wide knowledge management systems in the manner and with the governance tehcniques of process engineering (the current dominant approch) is a waste of time and has been seen to fail. Creating the conditions, with social computing tools and complexity based methods on the other hands allows an enterprise system to evolve.dave.snowdenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04525975175904216869noreply@blogger.com